20th April 2021

From:
Anne: Family of Smith, beneficiary, Trustor, and Secured-party to the Social Security Cestui que Trust ANNA SMITH
Without prejudice

c/o Address
Address line 2
Town
County
Nr [POSTCODE]


To:
Safety Camera Unit
PO Box 206
Plymouth, 
Devon PL6 5WY

Re: ES101/21/0055

Notice of Conditional Acceptance and Request for Verification

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for your unsigned Notice of Intended Prosecution dated 21/03/2022, which I possibly opened in error, as at first sight, it appeared to be addressed to Myself. I have noted the content of your notice and return it to you.

I must admit that I do not understand the alleged contravention, however, I would be happy to accept your offer of prosecution on condition that you provide substantive verification of a few points.

Please provide material evidence, not hearsay or opinion, which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that your notice was addressed to and intended for Myself, the living woman known as anna: smith, and NOT the person named MS KATHERINE ARMITAGE?

The alleged contravention apparently took place at 21:48 hours on 01/04/2021 at Borner's Bridge, South Molton, Devon. Whilst it is possible that I was travelling in my private car at that time, I not familiar with Borner's Bridge, South Molton [or I recall no occasion when I was at Borner's Bridge, South Molton], so I can neither confirm nor deny that either Myself and/or my private car were at that location, on that date and at that time.

Please provide material evidence, not hearsay or opinion, which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that my private car was at Borner
s Bridge, South Molton, Devon at 21:48 on 01/04/2021.

Having read the description of the alleged contravention, I am unable to determine who it was that sustained any harm, injury or loss, or whether a breach of the peace occurred.

If it can be proved that my private car was at Borner's Bridge, South Molton, Devon at 21:48 on 01/04/2021, then please
provide the name of the injured party and his or her sworn testimony detailing the nature of the tort.

The photocopied images you provided do indeed bear a striking resemblance to my private car but do you have any material evidence that they relate in any way to my private car?

Please provide the sworn testimony of two or more witnesses who have first-hand knowledge of the matter.

Having consulted Dun & Bradstreet, I have discovered that Devon and Cornwall Police is actually a for-profit corporation, and as such has as much 'authority' over me as any other private company actively trading for a profit, and you are therefore unable to place any demands upon me without my express consent.

Please provide a copy of the lawful two party contract between Myself and Devon and Cornwall Police, bearing my wet ink signature obligating performance, or material evidence, not hearsay or opinion, which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that your company has the power to force me into contracting with you.

Please provide the requested information with accompanying documentation and proofs of claim in Affidavit format, sworn under oath or attestation, under penalty of perjury and upon your full commercial liability that the facts contained therein are true, correct, complete and not misleading, within seven, (7), days of the date of this letter, otherwise, it will be deemed a tacit agreement by your acquiescence that all parties to mean you, and you principal or other parties abandon all demands upon me.

I must also decline your offer to complete the form on the reverse of the Notice of Intended Prosecution as I have not been presented with any material evidence that myself and/or my private car were involved in this offence, so unless and until I receive such evidence, I am not willing to waive my inalienable right to silence in order to provide consent or evidence for use in any subsequent prosecution, nor do I wish to enter into contract with your company.

Please Note: 
If you intend to proceed to court with this matter without providing the requested proofs of claim then my costs for attending court are a one off fee of £3500 (three thousand five hundred Great British pounds), and a consultation fee of £550 (five hundred and fifty Great British pounds) per hour, or part thereof, plus an inconvenience fee of £1000 (one thousand Great British pounds) plus travel expenses, food and accommodation. 

I will also require that the man or woman making the claim against me, and two or more witnesses with first-hand knowledge of the matter, be present in court and available for cross examination.

Postal Rule:
“The postal rule (also known as the mailbox rule or "deposited acceptance rule") is a term of common law-contracts which determines the timing of acceptance of an offer when mail is contemplated as the medium of acceptance. The general principle is that a contract is formed when acceptance is actually communicated to the offeror. The mailbox rule is an exception to the general principle. The mailbox rule provides that the contract is formed when a properly pre-paid and properly addressed letter of acceptance is posted."

Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or frivolity
By: anna: smith, bene.

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Enc:  Original paperwork as received